Match package to problem
A new local business, an ecommerce store and a site with a traffic drop need different work. Buy the scope that fits your situation, not the biggest tier.
There is no single best SEO package, only the one that matches your site, market and goals. Packages bundle the same handful of activities in different amounts, so the useful skill is reading what is actually in the bundle. This guide breaks a package into its components, uses Google’s own SEO Starter Guide to separate real work from filler, shows the tier patterns seen in public listings, and gives a decision framework by business type.
// note: I sell SEO services here, so I have an interest. I name no competitors’ packages. Tier patterns come from reading public listings and a few pricing surveys, not from a controlled study. For my own offers see pricing.
| component | what it covers |
|---|---|
| Audit | technical and content baseline |
| On-page | titles, headings, internal links |
| Content | new pages and updates |
| Authority | earned links, mentions |
| Local | profile, citations, reviews |
| Reporting | results and next steps |
A new local business, an ecommerce store and a site with a traffic drop need different work. Buy the scope that fits your situation, not the biggest tier.
Counts of pages, articles and links are inputs, not results. Ask how each will be chosen, checked and reported.
Google says it does not use meta keywords, no ideal word count exists, and heading order is not a ranking dependency. Packages built on those are padding.
Almost every package, from budget to enterprise, is a mix of these parts in different amounts.
| Component | What good looks like | Warning sign |
|---|---|---|
| Audit | A written review of crawling, indexing, site structure, content and links, with a prioritised fix list | An automated report pasted in with no interpretation |
| Keyword and topic research | Pages mapped to search intent and to your actual services | A long keyword list with no mapping to pages |
| On-page optimisation | Clear unique titles, useful content, sensible internal links, descriptive image alt text | Keyword stuffing or meta keywords |
| Technical work | Indexing, redirects, canonical URLs, speed and mobile checks | Changes made with no explanation |
| Content | Original, people-first pages and updates to old ones | Thin or rehashed articles to hit a monthly count |
| Authority and links | Earning mentions through useful content and outreach | Paid links or schemes promised at a fixed number a month |
| Local SEO | Verified Business Profile, accurate details, genuine reviews | Fake reviews or fake addresses |
| Reporting | Leads, calls and organic traffic plus what changed and why | Ranking screenshots for hand-picked terms |
Google’s SEO Starter Guide is the closest thing to an official checklist (Google Search Central). A package that covers the real items is delivering value. Its main points:
// if a package leans on these as selling points, ask what else it does.
These are patterns seen across public listings, not an industry standard. Names and contents vary.
// typical fit: new or small sites that need the basics done correctly.
// typical fit: sites with a sound base that want more visibility.
// typical fit: large or complex sites and multi-site brands.
For what these tiers tend to cost, see my breakdown of SEO pricing per month, which uses Ahrefs and SE Ranking survey data. The step up between tiers is mostly more hours, not a different method.
| Your situation | What to prioritise | What to skip at first |
|---|---|---|
| New local business, small site | Audit, core pages, verified Business Profile, reviews, citations | Large content programmes, aggressive link buying |
| Established local business, flat leads | Audit, local pages for each service/area, content refresh, local links | National campaigns |
| Ecommerce store | Technical structure, category and product pages, content, internal links | Blog volume for its own sake |
| Site that lost traffic | Diagnosis first: indexing, links, updates, tracking | New content before finding the cause |
| Content-heavy publisher or SaaS | Topic strategy, content quality, links through useful assets | Generic local tactics |
| Planning a redesign or migration | A project package: redirects, URL mapping, launch checks | Monthly retainer until after launch |
If your site has an indexing problem, start with my crawled, currently not indexed guide before paying for more content.
Some packages now bundle AI visibility audits or AI-search optimisation. Google’s guidance on hiring an SEO says to check recommendations against official Google guidance and to apply the same scrutiny to “AEO” or “GEO” advice, and that third-party tools do not have access to Google’s internal ranking data (Google Search Central).
In practice, ask what the add-on actually changes on your site and how success is measured. Clear, accurate, well-structured content that answers real questions is the common thread; be wary of formulas that promise guaranteed citations.
The middle option is often the most profitable for the seller. Start with the audit, then pick scope.
Twenty links or ten articles tell you nothing about quality, relevance or effect.
You will need to approve content, supply photos, and give access. Budget time.
Record current leads, calls and traffic before starting. Otherwise you cannot judge results.
Choose a short initial term or a clear exit, especially with a new provider.
Google says no one can guarantee a top ranking. Treat any such promise as a red flag. See how to choose an SEO company.
I read Google’s SEO Starter Guide and its page on hiring an SEO, and scanned public package listings from several vendors and directories to see how tiers are structured. I do not endorse or rank any vendor’s package. I did not buy or test any package for this guide. Tier descriptions are my summary of common patterns, not a standard, and what is “best” depends on your site and goals.
There is no universal best. The right package matches your site’s stage, market and goals, and lists specific deliverables and reporting.
An audit, keyword and topic research, on-page and technical work, content, a legitimate approach to earning links, local SEO if relevant, and reporting that ties to leads.
They can be, when scope matches your need and you can measure results. They are less useful when the deliverables are padded or the contract is hard to exit.
Starter suits new or small sites needing foundations. Growth suits sites with a sound base that want more content and links. Enterprise suits large or multi-location sites.
Be wary of fixed monthly link counts. Google treats links obtained mainly to manipulate rankings as spam. Ask how links are earned.
No. Google lists meta keywords among things not to focus on, so a package that sells them is padding.
Often yes. Many providers sell audits, content and local setup separately, which can suit a small budget.
Line up deliverables, ask how each is done and measured, and compare reporting and exit terms rather than names and prices alone.
A project-based audit or fix is cheaper and clearer than a retainer. See the SEO report guide for what an audit should deliver.