Diagnose first
Slow pages, thin visibility and weak conversion look alike in a revenue report. A consultant earns their fee by naming which one is limiting you.
“Website optimization” covers three overlapping jobs: making the site fast and technically sound, making it findable in search, and making visitors take action. A good consultant knows which of the three is your bottleneck. This guide explains each discipline, the Core Web Vitals thresholds Google publishes, how an engagement usually runs, what to ask before hiring, and when you do not need a consultant at all.
// note: I sell SEO services here, so I have an interest. This is a reference guide, not a ranking of consultants. Vendor and freelancer descriptions are summarised from their public pages; I did not hire or test any. For my own services see pricing.
| discipline | question it answers |
|---|---|
| Performance | is the site fast and stable? |
| SEO | can people find it in search? |
| CRO | do visitors take action? |
Slow pages, thin visibility and weak conversion look alike in a revenue report. A consultant earns their fee by naming which one is limiting you.
Google publishes targets for loading, interactivity and stability. Ask for before and after numbers against them.
Conversion changes should be measured. Design opinions are not evidence.
Providers describe the field as a blend of performance work, on-page SEO and conversion optimisation. Their scope varies, so check which parts a given person actually does.
| Discipline | Typical work | Measured by |
|---|---|---|
| Performance and technical | Speed and Core Web Vitals fixes, image and script handling, caching, mobile checks, crawling and indexing issues | Field data for loading, interactivity and layout stability; indexed pages |
| Search (SEO) | Titles, internal links, content, structure, site architecture | Impressions, clicks and rankings in Search Console |
| Conversion (CRO) | Behaviour analysis, forms and checkout friction, page messaging, A/B tests | Conversion rate, revenue per visitor, lead quality |
| Analytics | Tracking set-up, goals, reporting | Trustworthy numbers to judge everything else |
Freelance marketplaces typically separate a narrow performance fix from a broad audit. One platform’s listing describes a focused speed fix as taking one to two weeks and a full audit across speed, SEO and CRO as taking three to six, which matches common experience but is a vendor claim, not a standard.
Google’s web.dev documents three user-centred metrics and the values considered good (web.dev). Measure at the 75th percentile of page loads, split by mobile and desktop. A page passes only if it meets all three at that percentile.
Google’s Starter Guide also lists page experience among the aspects worth caring about, but notes it is one signal among many and not a substitute for helpful content (Google Search Central). So a consultant should not promise rankings from speed work alone.
// a single 90+ lab score is not the same as passing in the field.
SEO is mainly about visibility; CRO is about what happens after the click. Consultants who specialise here describe analysing where visitors click, hesitate or leave, then running tests rather than redesigning on taste. Reasonable expectations:
| Your situation | Better fit |
|---|---|
| Site is slow, you do not know why | Performance specialist or developer |
| Traffic is flat or falling | SEO audit first; see SEO report guide |
| Plenty of traffic, few leads or sales | CRO consultant |
| Planning a redesign or migration | Involve an SEO early to protect existing rankings |
| Small site, tight budget | DIY basics from this DIY guide before paying anyone |
| Pages not being indexed | Technical SEO; start with this indexing guide |
Google says no one can guarantee top placement. Treat such promises as a warning. See choosing an SEO company.
A perfect lab score on a single page is not the same as a fast, converting site.
If nothing is measured before work starts, results cannot be proven later.
A full rebuild is expensive and risky for rankings. Ask what simpler fix was ruled out.
You should understand what is being changed on your own site.
Prefer a short first phase with a clear review point.
I read Google’s web.dev page on Core Web Vitals and the SEO Starter Guide, and scanned public pages from agencies, freelancers and marketplaces describing optimisation and CRO services. I quote no outcome claims from vendors as fact. I did not hire or test any consultant. Timeframes mentioned are one marketplace’s description, not a standard. Thresholds can change, so check web.dev for the current values.
They diagnose and improve how a site performs technically, how visible it is in search and how well it converts visitors, then measure the results.
No. SEO focuses on search visibility; optimization is broader and also covers speed, user experience and conversion.
Per web.dev: LCP 2.5 seconds or less, INP 200 milliseconds or less, CLS 0.1 or less, measured at the 75th percentile.
A focused speed fix can take a week or two; a full audit across speed, SEO and CRO can take several weeks. Judging results usually takes longer.
Possibly slightly, but page experience is one signal among many. Faster pages also help users, which can help conversion.
When you already get decent traffic but few leads or sales, and want to find out why visitors leave.
Basic checks, yes. See my DIY guide. Complex technical or testing work often benefits from a specialist.
It varies widely by scope and region. For SEO-related ranges see SEO pricing per month.